The scheduling problem at Aura Biopharma
Scheduling mandatory protocol review sessions between busy hospital oncology department heads and internal medical monitors took 3 to 4 weeks of email negotiations per research site.
- Principal investigators possess scarce calendar availability across emergency duties and research
- Trials required joint attendance of three distinct medical and compliance disciplines
- Time zone differences between US East Coast and Central European trial centers exacerbated delays
What Aura Biopharma set up in Caletus
Aura Biopharma configured Caletus collective scheduling links checking availability across clinical leads, biostatisticians, and site monitors simultaneously.
- Multi-host collective availability algorithms
- Automated timezone conversion for hospital sites
- Medical document attachment collection in booking flow
- Pre-meeting briefing buffers
- Week 1
- Week 2
- Week 3
- Week 4 · live
The results at Aura Biopharma
Site initiation review scheduling was compressed from 24 days to 4 days, allowing the trial to commence patient dosing three weeks ahead of schedule.
- Protocol review scheduling intervalHow: Trial Master File (TMF) milestone timestamp trackingDecreased from 24.2 days to 3.8 days per investigative site
- Investigator attendance complianceHow: GCP regulatory attendance sign-in logs100% full panel attendance achieved on the first scheduled briefing
- Overall study launch timelineHow: Clinical trial management system (CTMS) project planFirst Patient In (FPI) milestone reached 21 calendar days ahead of deadline
